Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Plast Surg ; 88(4 Suppl 4): S316-S319, 2022 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35180755

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rectourethral fistula (RUF) is an uncommon serious condition with various etiologies including neoplasm, radiation therapy, and surgery. Treatment for RUF remains problematic with a high recurrence rate. Although studies have suggested the recurrence rate of RUF is lower after surgical repair using a gracilis flap, outcomes have varied and the studies were small and inadequately controlled. Here, we compare outcomes of RUF repair with and without gracilis flap to evaluate its efficacy in preventing fistula recurrence and identify risk factors for recurrence. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who had undergone surgical repair for RUF between 2007 and 2018 at our institution and had at least 30 days of follow-up. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and surgical outcomes were recorded and compared for patients who had gracilis flap repair and those who did not (controls). Single variable logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for recurrence. RESULTS: The gracilis group (n = 24) and control group (n = 12) had similar demographics and comorbidities. Fistula recurrence was far less frequent in the gracilis group (8% vs 50%, P = 0.009). There were no significant differences in other outcomes including length of hospitalization and surgical complications. When recurrent RUF was treated with a muscle flap (gracilis or inferior gluteus), 83% of the group had no additional fistula recurrence. In the control group, history of radiation ( P = 0.04) and urinary incontinence ( P = 0.015) were associated with fistula recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend using a gracilis flap for RUF repair given its association with lower recurrence without increased surgical complications.


Assuntos
Fístula Retal , Doenças Uretrais , Fístula Urinária , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fístula Retal/prevenção & controle , Fístula Retal/cirurgia , Fístula Retal/etiologia , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Doenças Uretrais/etiologia , Doenças Uretrais/prevenção & controle , Doenças Uretrais/cirurgia , Fístula Urinária/etiologia , Fístula Urinária/prevenção & controle , Fístula Urinária/cirurgia
2.
Urol Clin North Am ; 48(4): 557-563, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34602175

RESUMO

Penile fracture is a urologic injury with an etiology that varies based on the cultural milieu. Diagnosis can be made based on history and physical examination alone. Patients should be evaluated with RUG or cystoscopy when urethral injury is suspected. Ultrasound or MRI is a helpful adjunct when the diagnosis is unclear, and can assist in identifying the location of the rupture. Surgical management is favored over conservative measures to improve outcomes. Delayed surgical repair may not be inferior to immediate intervention.


Assuntos
Pênis/lesões , Humanos , Masculino , Ruptura/diagnóstico , Ruptura/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Urology ; 137: e12-e13, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31794812

RESUMO

We present a case of recurrent episodes of foreign body insertion into the urethra, ultimately resulting in urethral defect at the penoscrotal junction. We have decided against treating the urethral defect as it facilitates nonoperative retrieval of the urethral foreign bodies. We present our experience and rationale for the clinical management of this complex patient.


Assuntos
Corpos Estranhos/complicações , Comportamento Autodestrutivo/complicações , Uretra/lesões , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...